a SLACK Incorporated newspaper

Navigation Bar (see page bottom for text links)

Pharmaceutical industry urges FDA to classify bacteremia as a disease

Defining bacteremia as a primary infection would allow the industry to focus on developing specific antibiotics.

[Nosocomial bacteremia] [Clinical trials]
[Your turn]

October 1998

WASHINGTON, D.C. - With bacteremia that is unresponsive to treatment becoming more persistent and dangerous, representatives of eight pharmaceutical companies pleaded with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to classify it as a disease instead of just a marker for severe underlying infection.

Defining bacteremia as a primary infection - as it was years ago - would make it possible to develop antibiotics to treat it directly, industry representatives stated at a recent FDA/industry conference here.

[bar]
Nosocomial bacteremia

"Three major changes in nosocomial bacteremia over the last decade support making it an approvable clinical indication," said Francis P. Tally, MD, from Cubist Pharmaceuticals Inc. "A significant number of gram-positive bacteremia patients have no identifiable underlying infection," he said. "Yet some reports have noted a 30% in-hospital mortality that can't be attributed to anything but bacteremia."

Tally argued that physicians trying to manage patients with severe primary bacteremias need a real change in the official view that only a source-specific bacteremia is an indication for drug approval.

"Recent studies show that some 25% of resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections and 47% of VRE have no identifiable source. That means there's no approved drug available to help these patients."

He cautioned against restricting industry from developing approvable products. This creates an ever-increasing patient population without therapeutic options, according to Tally and other industry speakers.

"The absence of a bacteremia indication for many recently approved anti-infective drug products leaves clinicians without sufficient guidance for treating these seriously ill patients," said Michael Zeckel, MD, from Lilly Research Laboratories. "Without such guidance, a physician may use an antimicrobial agent with only limited potential efficacy against a highly lethal infection."

Zeckel also suggested that "Even knowledge that an antibiotic is approved for a relevant primary indication [i.e. nosocomial pneumonia including cases complicated by bacteremia] may not help the clinician, since a positive blood culture may be the first evidence of infection in 50% of bacteremic patients; a substantial proportion [22% to 48%] of bacteremic patients have no primary site of infection identified even in retrospect; patients may have multiple sites of infection, colonization and metastatic involvement, making specific identification of the primary site of infection uncertain; and identification of the primary site of infection, even in patients with bacteremia, may not be accurate."

Zeckel concluded, "Bacteremia should be considered as an appropriate indication for regulatory approval given: the importance of bacteremia as a public health problem; the ability to explicitly define the syndrome; the relative specificity of blood cultures in identifying the etiologic agent; the clarity of endpoints; and the need for guidance for clinicians charged with selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy for a common and potentially serious infection."

[bar]
Clinical trials

Considering bacteremia as an approvable indication, industry speakers urged that patients be enrolled sooner in clinical trials and not—as was the case with quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer), which awaits approval—have entry criteria restricted to treatment failure.

Other recommended changes in clinical trial design for bacteremia included fewer blood cultures than currently required and the use of adjunctive therapy.

The FDA's Anti-Infective Drug Products Advisory Committee will discuss these and many other suggestions when it meets later this month to encourage new drug development to fight antibiotic resistance.

Other drug companies represented at the conference included Bristol Myers Squibb, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Schering-Plough, SmithKline Beecham and MRL Pharmaceutical Services.

For your information:
  • Myers JP, Linnemann CC. Bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 1982;145:532-36.
  • Mylotte JM, Aeschlimann JR, Rotella DL. Staphylococcus aureusbacteremia: factors predicting hospital mortality. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:165-68.
  • Harbath S, Rutschmann O, Sudre P, Pittet D. Impact of methicillin resistance on the outcome of patients with bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:182-89.
  • Conterno LO, Wey SB, Castelo A. Risk factors for mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:32-37.
  • Romero-Vivas J, Rubio M, Fernandez C, Picazo JJ. Mortality associated with nosocomial bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:1417-23.
  • Bryan CS, Reynolds KL. Bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia. Analysis of 172 episodes from a single metropolitan area. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:668-71.

[bar]

[bar]
Your turn

*You can express your views on this article, or other relevant themes, in the Infectious Diseases in Children Specialty Forums.



[Infectious Diseases in Children Homepage]
[Current Issue] [Back Issues] [Breaking News]
[Online Seminar] [Specialty Forums] [Industry Link]
[Search]
Copyright 2000, SLACK Incorporated. Revised 15 September 2000.